Hello, Kind and Beautiful Human, I have a story for you…….

A long time ago, in a Disney leadership program that pulled in outside thinkers, I heard a John Maxwell concept that has stayed glued to my brain:

“Don’t send ducks to eagle school.”

Simple. Funny. Slightly brutal.

And… wildly useful.

Because most of us waste an absurd amount of time doing exactly that.

We keep trying to “coach” people into becoming something they’re not.

We keep promoting for the wrong reasons.
We keep “developing” the wrong problem.
We keep dragging a duck up a mountain and calling it leadership.

And then we act surprised when everyone is exhausted.

What Maxwell meant (in plain English)

A duck isn’t “bad.”
A duck is just a duck.

A duck thrives in a very specific environment:

  • clear structure

  • consistent routines

  • defined expectations

  • steady performance

  • lower ambiguity

An eagle isn’t “better.”
An eagle is just… built differently.

An eagle thrives when:

  • the target is fuzzy

  • the stakes are real

  • the environment is changing

  • the job requires judgment, not just execution

  • the leader is expected to create clarity, not wait for it

So the point isn’t “eagles good / ducks bad.”

The point is: stop confusing development with denial.

You can train skills.
You can’t train wiring.

The leadership lie: “If I just coach harder, they’ll become an eagle.”

This is the part where leadership gets messy.

If you’ve been a senior leader, you know this feeling:
You see potential in someone.
You want them to rise.
You invest.
You mentor.
You give them air cover.
You give them stretch assignments.

And they still… don’t soar.

Not because they’re lazy.
Not because they’re a bad person.

Because the role requires eagle behavior:

  • making decisions without complete info

  • holding tension without flinching

  • prioritizing in chaos

  • taking heat

  • being accountable for outcomes, not activity

And that’s not their natural habitat.

The real cost of “eagle school” for ducks

When you push a duck into an eagle role, you don’t “level them up.”

You usually get:

  • anxiety disguised as perfectionism

  • rigidity disguised as “standards”

  • defensiveness disguised as “communication issues”

  • micromanagement disguised as “quality control”

  • burnout disguised as “commitment”

And the saddest part?

They often blame themselves.

Meanwhile, the team pays the price.

This is where Radical Kindness actually shows up

Radical Kindness isn’t being “nice.”

It’s being honest and human at the same time.

Radical Kindness is saying:

  • “This role is asking you to be someone you’re not.”

  • “You’re not failing — you’re mismatched.”

  • “Let’s put you where you can win.”

That conversation is hard.
And it’s leadership.

The 2026 question I’m sitting with and using with my clients:

Where are we sending ducks to eagle school — and calling it development?

In my work, I see this in three places all the time:

  1. Promotion decisions

    • rewarding tenure instead of readiness

    • promoting great individual contributors into people leadership with no appetite for it

  2. Hiring

    • hiring for résumé prestige instead of role reality

    • hiring “eagles” into duck environments — then punishing them for being eagles

  3. How we lead

    • expecting everyone to thrive in ambiguity

    • punishing people who need clarity instead of providing it

A quick gut-check (for you and your team)

Ask yourself:

  • In this role, is success more about execution or judgment?

  • Does the job require comfort with ambiguity — or the ability to create structure?

  • Is the environment stable — or constantly shifting?

  • When things go wrong, does this person own it — or explain it?

  • Do they gain energy from challenge — or from certainty?

If you’re honest about the answers, you’ll know what you’re dealing with.

This also connects to Ken Blanchard’s Raving Fans lesson: great service isn’t compliance — it’s empowered judgment, which is exactly what ‘eagle roles’ demand. This is one of my favorite customer experience books and I wanted to add in this call out to celebrate my learnings

The punchline

You can teach a duck a lot.

But you can’t teach a duck to be an eagle.

And you shouldn’t try.

Because the goal of leadership isn’t to turn people into something else.

It’s to put them in a place where they can do their best work — and help them do more of it.

That’s not soft.

That’s smart.

Go Soar or Swim - Your Choice!

In Community and Conversation,

Jim

Olive and Cricket say “Hi!”

Recommended for you